Hell
This is how our National University of Singapore (NUS) pays its professors:
NUS terms of service for faculty appointments
(http://www.nus.edu.sg/ohr/jobs/faculty/terms_service_acad.htm)
- "Singapore Citizens and Singapore Permanent Residents receive statutory Central Provident Fund (CPF) benefits, in the form of monthly contributions to the CPF. For those aged below 50, the rates of contributions are 20% and 13% of gross monthly salary, by the faculty member and the University respectively, subject to a salary ceiling of $4,500 pm for year 2006. The rates for those above 50 years of age are lower. Contributions are tax -exempt and may be withdrawn at the age of 55 or when the faculty member leaves Singapore/Malaysia permanently; while
- Faculty members who are not Singapore Citizens or Singapore Permanent Residents may receive, in lieu of provident fund benefits, a monthly Special Payment for Foreign Staff which is calculated at 125% of the employer’s CPF contribution rate, on monthly salary, subject to the same salary ceiling as for CPF contributions. For those below 50, the rate is therefore 16.25%, subject to a maximum of S$731.25 for year 2006. The payment is taxable."
Let the good Human Battery help put a monetary meaning to all these mumbo jumbo:
Every month, NUS pays each of its foreign professor 125% of what it pays its local professors. This translate to (16.25 - 13)% * $4500 = $146.25 in cash (and NUS has the cheek to call it a "monthly special payment"). Meanwhile, its singaporean professors get nothing in cash or in cpf! Zero! Ling2 Dan4!
At the end of a standard 6 years tenure period (two 3-years contracts), NUS would have paid its foreign professor $146.25 * 12 * 6 = $10,530 more than an equally qualified local professor.
Q: Meaning?
A: Meaning if you were a Singaporean who had decided to heed the government's call to do a PhD in some biotech field at, say, Harvard University, this is what might happen to you in future: you work closely with a China-born fellow student in your lab. Upon graduation, both of you receive job offers at NUS's science faculty - not a far fetched idea, since Singapore is expanding its bioscience research and the government opens its legs and pussy arms to foreign "talents".
You, the local, get paid about $150 less each month and receive about $10,000 less at the end of the two 3-years contract, compared to your buddy, the China-born foreigner, who is also from Harvard and who is working in that same biotech research field as you and who has more or less the same number of publications as you!
So what's the difference between the two of you that makes you deserve less and he more?
Nothing -- except that in the eyes of NUS/ MOE/ Matrix Master (MM), you are a lowly shitty Sink-a-Poor-人 by birth!
Q: Bigger meaning?
A: Meaning if you -- i.e. my readers from overseas -- don't want to suffer such humiliation and insults, don't come back to Singapore once you have left. You are truly a second-class citizen in your own country, and if previously you had any doubt about this "hunch", NUS has spelt it out in black and white to help you see things clearly in no uncertain terms. What more evidence do you need?
$150 a month is no big deal, especially when you are earning a 5-figure salary. But that's not the crux of the matter, is it? The point that matters is: why do you want to stomach such discrimination in your own country? Why should you? It's not as if you cannot find a job elsewhere where everyone with the same qualification is paid the same wage for the same job!
And do not think for a moment that you are abandoning your own country when you do that. Firstly, you are in effect helping to exert pressure on the Matrix Masters to treat locals fairly, lest more human batteries leave. Secondly, this country has abandoned you first, anyway...
Q: Biggest meaning?
A: Note that NUS has the audacity (or was it "stupidity"?) to state its discriminatory policy openly on its website. But NUS is merely an extension of MOE and takes its cue and instruction from the latter (even though it is supposedly "autonomous")!
So, I leave it to you guys to draw your own conclusion as to what it means in general: how do other ministries and statutory boards and government-linked companies - all of which are "cleverer" than NUS when it comes to publishing their HR policies on the web - pay/treat their employees/customers who are foreigners viz a viz equally-qualified Sink-a-Poor-人?!?
Time to leave!
If you can...
But alas, I can't. Sob!
Neo: Mr. Wizard. Get me the hell out of here.
9 Comments:
Let's see how popular or unpopular this web site is. Let's see if NUS will or will not get wind of what is written here, and if they will delete the offending webpage (but continue to practise discrimination quietly). Or maybe, very coincidentally(!!), some reporter will on his own initiative, conduct an exclusive interview with NUS where NUS will conincidentally talk about how the cpf contribution for locals used to be 16.25%, but when it dropped to 13%, somehow NUS did not see the need to reduce the corresponding "monthly special payment" to 13%?
Then again, maybe nothing will happen. We bloggers should not think too highly of ourselves. Why should any Master, least of all the Matrix Master, pay attention to mere human batteries ranting on the web? It's not the high profile main-stream media, remember?
Haha!
Though you kind of like mention before that you are leaving but now you change your mind or what?
How is the traffic of your blog before & now?
No lah, never said before I am leaving. But if I can, I will. Won't you? Blog traffic reached its peak when tomorrow.sg picked up the organ-robbery story. Since then, it has stabalised.
The human battery:
You forgot one thing: CPF contributions by the employee (20 percent) and employer (13 percent) are not taxable by IRAS. The 20 percent which the foreigner receives plus the additional 16.25 percent are.
You forgot that NUS pays for the international school fees of up to two children of its foreign professors. By your reasoning (that the resulting net pay should be the same), NUS should pay the equivalent amt in cash to its local employee. No? Actually, no need to go into the nitty gritty of tax rebate, deductibles etc. It is very simple: If you are a local, you get $X a month. If you are a foreigner, you get $X + $150 "monthly special payment" + $Y00*2 school fees for your two kids, + $Z00 in subsidised housing.
Why such discrimination given that both the local and foreign professors studied overseas before coming to sg? Ans: because we are second class citizens in our own country. Solution: Give up your citizenship, come back to sg as a foreigner, and suddenly your salary and perks and bonus increase by a substantial amt, compared to when you were a citizen!
The MM has always been spiteful and vicious towards the country's citizens but bootlicks the colonialists.
You forgot that NUS pays for the international school fees of up to two children of its foreign professors. By your reasoning (that the resulting net pay should be the same), NUS should pay the equivalent amt in cash to its local employee.
Erm, locals can enroll in our local schools which is subsidised.
If you are a foreigner, you get $X + $150 "monthly special payment" + $Y00*2 school fees for your two kids, + $Z00 in subsidised housing.
Don't know about NUS but at NTU, local academic staff who have been out of Singapore for more than 5 years before joining NTU qualify for a housing allowance. Also, there are restrictions on non-PR foreigners buying properties in Singapore.
> Erm, locals can enroll in our local schools which is subsidised.
So? What's the relevance? We are talking about the principle of paying equally-qualified employees the same wage and benefits for the same job, instead of discriminationg against locals and paying them less and foreigners more. You can argue all you want (though you have not done so yet), why locals are not allowed to enrol their kids in international schools, or how wonderful the 40-students-per-class local schools are, compared to the 20-per-class international schools etc. So what? Out of point, Mr. Fox! The fact remains that a foreign employee gets $Y000 in kids' tuition allowance whereas a local can neither enrol his kid in international school (if he choose to, nevermind the reason), nor get the cash equivalence of $Y000 from NUS. See the point in bold above!
> there are restrictions on non-PR foreigners buying properties in Singapore.
Again: so? That's a totally different issue, a policy under the purview of the Ministry of National Development, in fact. It has nothing to do with wage discrimination. See topic in bold.
To reiterate my point with the new points you supplied - It is very simple: If you were a foreigner, you get $X + $150 "monthly special payment" + $Y000 school fees for your two kids, + $Z000 in subsidised housing. if you were a local, you get $X. That's it. Too bad you cannot enrol your kids at a $Y000-per-month 20-student-per-class international school. And too bad too, you are not going to get the equivalence of $Y000 in cash. And sorry, you are not going to get any housing allowance - but yeah, if you fill up a long form and submit certified copies of this and that to show that you are out of the country for >5 years, we may consider giving you the $Z00. So, as a local, some things you don't get, some things you can get only after submitting detailed proof. But hey, if you give up your citizenship and gets a foreign one, you hit jackpot: NUS will give you all of the above extra with no further question asked - just show your 22K gold-plated foreign passport and everything will be there for you.
Did I miss anything? Now, shall we stick to the topic at hand (conveniently written in bold), instead of diverting it away to education policies of children, or national development policies? :)
> The MM has always been spiteful and vicious towards the country's citizens but bootlicks the colonialists.
In fact, bootlicked so much that he is even much more successful than the British at destroying the diverse local cultures and varied language scenes and converting the Island into a mono-culture, single-language island that is more "England" than England - something that the British has never ever done to any of its colony!!! Just compare the cultural and lanauge scene pre and post independence and you will get what I mean.
Post a Comment
<< Home